The user wants a detailed article in Russian on the topic: «Профилактические визиты: отличия от проверок и обязательность исполнения предписаний» (Preventive visits: differences from inspections and mandatory execution of prescriptions).

Constraints:

Language: Russian.3. Role: Helpful assistant.
Source material: Provided snippet from the internet (dated ).
Key points to cover based on prompt and source:

• Definition of preventive visits.
• Differences from inspections (checks).
• Mandatory nature (cannot refuse for high/extreme risk groups until 2030).
• Purpose: prevention, informing about requirements, risk criteria, ways to reduce risk category.
• No protocols, fines, or prescriptions during the visit itself (usually), but the prompt asks about «обязательность исполнения предписаний» (mandatory execution of prescriptions) ⎯ this is a tricky legal nuance. The source says «Он не предполагает вынесения предписаний» (It does not provide for issuing prescriptions). However, the prompt asks about «обязательность исполнения предписаний». I need to reconcile this: usually, following a visit, if violations are found later or if a prescription is issued based on other grounds, it’s mandatory. Or perhaps the prompt implies «recommendations» given during the visit. I must clarify the legal status: the visit